Sponsored byFusecodeEnterprise coding API for Claude Code, Codex, and model workflows.
LogoLMSpeed
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Leaderboard
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Models
  4. Glm 4.1v Thinking Flash vs Gpt 4o
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Tools
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Audit
Company
  • About
Resources
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
  • Public API
  • Botab
  • VidBee
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 57

Model compare

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT-4o

The readout for GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash and GPT-4o, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

Zhipu AI

Contender
vs

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-4o

OpenAI

Leading

Key Takeaways

Weighted outcome: GPT-4o. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.

Decision read

GPT-4o

GPT-4o has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 40 to 60.

Evidence depth

57 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-4o

The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Change comparison

Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.

Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.

On this page

Comparison sheetWhen to choose each modelBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesFAQ

Comparison sheet

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Model compare
ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o
Overall leaderContenderLeading
Weighted overall score40.0 pts60.0 pts
Benchmark category leads0 categories0 categories
Operational advantagesCheapest input price, Average speedFirst-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage
Context windowNo data128K tokens
Max outputNo data16.4K tokens
ModalitiesNo data

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeWeb search

The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.

Model metadata

Model compare
ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o
DeveloperZhipu AIOpenAI
ReleasedNo dataNov 2024
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo data2023-10-31
OpenRouter IDNo dataopenai/gpt-4o
ReferencesNo dataNo data

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Average speed.

OpenAI

GPT-4o

GPT-4o has these operational advantages: First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage.

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Category performance

Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.

Model A coverage
0 / 8
Model B coverage
6 / 8
Shared
0 shared categories

Avg. score

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

-

Avg. score

GPT-4o

43.2

Agents

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o39

Coding

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o46.3

Reasoning

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o40.5

Knowledge

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o49.7

Math

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o42.2

Multilingual

No data

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o-

Multimodal

No data

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o-

Instruction following

GPT-4o

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash-
GPT-4o41.5

Professional benchmark details

Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.

No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash
OpenAIGPT-4o
KFCV505 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-4o

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 13138ms

input / output

No data

DMXAPI0 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-4o

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

IXIOCCAPI0 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

glm-4.1v-thinking-flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.0002/M/$0.0002/M

OpenAI

GPT-4o

gpt-4o-all

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$30.00/M/$150.00/M

Koyeb AI Gateway0 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-4o

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Newagiai0 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-4o

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

钱多多 API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash

glm-4.1v-thinking-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.255/M/$0.255/M

OpenAI

GPT-4o

gpt-4o-2024-05-13

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$8.57/M/$25.70/M

FAQ

Weighted outcome: GPT-4o. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT-4o into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT 5glm-4-1v-thinking-flash-vs-gpt-5ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT 5 1glm-4-1v-thinking-flash-vs-gpt-5-1ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT 5 2glm-4-1v-thinking-flash-vs-gpt-5-2ChatGLMGLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT 4glm-4-1v-thinking-flash-vs-gpt-4

Data as of Jul 28, 2026, 08:19 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.