LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-4.5 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-4.5 vs GPT-5.2

glm-4-5-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins1 wins5 wins
Where it leadsFree providersCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGLM-4.5 exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, JSON mode.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperNo dataOpenAI
Context window131.1K tokens128K tokens
Max output98.3K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerOtherGPT
Knowledge cutoff2024-12-31No data
OpenRouter IDz-ai/glm-4.5openai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-4.5
OpenAIGPT-5.2
LiveCodeBench
73.8%#26
88.9%#4
MMLU-Pro
83.5%#25
87.4%#6
GPQA
78.2%#60
90.3%#9
HLE
12.2%#62
35.4%#9
SciCode
34.8%#76
52.1%#9
Input price
$0.600/M#23
$1.75/M#35
Output price
$2.20/M#25
$14.00/M#43
Time to first token
1.01 s#36
115.69 s#108

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.5
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.5
OpenAIGPT-5.2
N1N15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

55 tok/s / 1434ms

input / output

No data

WONG公益站5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 2953ms

input / output

No data

WSocket AI5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

54 tok/s / 1449ms

input / output

No data

小水管 API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

71 tok/s / 2893ms

input / output

No data

Seamee API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

ZhipuAI/GLM-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

紫脑喵
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

glm-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $600.00/M

CHB API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

zai-org/GLM-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.03/M / $1.03/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.024/M / $0.192/M

ZEN-AI VIP
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

glm-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.164/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.072/M / $0.575/M

Zero API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5

glm-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.151/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.120/M / $0.959/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-4.5
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

GLM-4.5

GLM-4.5 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4.5 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ChatGLMGLM-4.5 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.56 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4.5 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.56 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:08 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.