Data points: 73
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.6 and Ring Flash 2.0, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Ring Flash 2.0. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Ring Flash 2.0
Ring Flash 2.0 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 38.7 to 61.3.
Evidence depth
73 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Ring Flash 2.0
The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6 and Ring Flash 2.0: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.6 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 38.7 pts | 61.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.6 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | No data |
| Released | Sep 2025 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-03-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.6 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6 and Ring Flash 2.0: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Ring Flash 2.0
Ring Flash 2.0 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.6
44.8
Avg. score
Ring Flash 2.0
47.1
GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 leads by 5.4
Ring Flash 2.0 leads by 6.6
GLM-4.6
Ring Flash 2.0 leads by 7.1
No data
No data
GLM-4.6
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.6
$0.550/M
Rank #77/163 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
winner$0.140/M
Rank #18/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
$0.963/M
Rank #74/163 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
winner$0.247/M
Rank #20/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
$2.20/M
Rank #69/163 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
winner$0.570/M
Rank #22/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
winner82.9%
Rank #42/125 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
79.3%
Rank #67/125 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
winner13.3%
Rank #77/186 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
8.9%
Rank #96/186 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
winner78.0%
Rank #82/187 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
72.5%
Rank #108/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
winner69.5%
Rank #30/115 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
62.8%
Rank #40/115 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6
winner38.4%
Rank #86/184 · confidence 4
Ring Flash 2.0
16.8%
Rank #180/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.6 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.6 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
25 tests | GLM-4.6 speed / latency 61 tok/s / 15383ms input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency 90 tok/s / 6434ms input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-4.6 speed / latency 101 tok/s / 1992ms input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency 124 tok/s / 5753ms input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-4.6 glm-4.6 speed / latency No data input / output $5.09/M/$20.36/M | Ring Flash 2.0 inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 speed / latency No data input / output $1.27/M |
Weighted outcome: Ring Flash 2.0. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
