Data points: 85
The readout for GLM-4.7 Flash and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.
Evidence depth
85 data points
Includes 10 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare GLM-4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.2glm-4-7-flash-vs-gpt-5-2 | Model A GLM-4.7 Flash | Model B GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 1 wins | 5 wins |
| Where it leads | Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.7 Flash
33.2
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
64.1
Selected category
Coding
GPT-5.2 leads by 22.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.7 Flash
11.0
Rank #91/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.2
winner75.0
Rank #13/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-12-11
GLM-4.7 Flash
20.63 s
Rank #78/113 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner0.71 s
Rank #20/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
0.88 s
Rank #31/113 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner0.71 s
Rank #25/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner101.2 tok/s
Rank #51/113 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
68.0 tok/s
Rank #69/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.070/M
Rank #5/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$1.75/M
Rank #104/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.153/M
Rank #10/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$4.81/M
Rank #113/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.400/M
Rank #12/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$14.00/M
Rank #113/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
7.1%
Rank #83/150 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner7.3%
Rank #81/150 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
58.1%
Rank #120/152 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner71.2%
Rank #85/152 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
33.7%
Rank #95/149 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner40.4%
Rank #48/149 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 Flash | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 Flash | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
20 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency 34 tok/s / 1567ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 Flash and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 Flash | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 Flash GLM-4.7 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Recent tests. | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 85 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 Flash exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | GPT-5.2 exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 16.4K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input FileImageText Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7-flash | openai/gpt-5.2 |
| References | No data | No data |
GPT-5.2
speed / latency
52 tok/s / 2671ms
input / output
No data
A310 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency 39 tok/s / 20716ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 1716ms input / output No data |
|---|
Moyanjdc API5 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash glm-4.7-flash speed / latency 53 tok/s / 20537ms input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-openai-compact speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M/$600.00/M |
|---|
VSLLM5 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency 41 tok/s / 21304ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
WSocket AI5 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 54 tok/s / 1449ms input / output No data |
|---|
GLM-4.7 Flash z-ai/glm-4.7-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.0049/M/$0.033/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $0.144/M/$1.15/M |
GLM-4.7 Flash glm-4.7-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.120/M/$0.959/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
