Data points: 130
The readout for GLM-4.7 and Kimi K2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
130 data points
Includes 32 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7
The charts below split 40 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2glm-4-7-vs-kimi-k2 | Model A GLM-4.7 | Model B Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.7
68.4
Avg. score
Kimi K2
57.2
Selected category
Instruction following
GLM-4.7 leads by 26.4
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.7
winner68.0
Rank #25/81 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
41.0
Rank #53/81 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner0.61 s
Rank #16/83 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
1.51 s
Rank #41/83 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
17.87 s
Rank #47/83 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
winner1.51 s
Rank #27/83 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner115.9 tok/s
Rank #28/83 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
23.8 tok/s
Rank #82/83 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$2.20/M
Rank #41/96 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
$2.50/M
Rank #45/96 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$1.00/M
Rank #43/96 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
$1.07/M
Rank #46/96 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
$0.600/M
Rank #46/96 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
$0.600/M
Rank #46/96 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner85.6%
Rank #18/74 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
81.9%
Rank #34/74 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner64.0
Rank #26/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
51.0
Rank #39/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner85.9%
Rank #26/104 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
76.7%
Rank #56/104 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner25.1%
Rank #31/104 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
6.3%
Rank #69/104 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner89.4%
Rank #2/70 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
61.0%
Rank #31/70 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner45.1
Rank #21/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
34.5
Rank #50/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner45.1%
Rank #25/102 · confidence 4
Kimi K2
30.7%
Rank #81/102 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner72.5
Rank #29/68 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
53.4
Rank #41/68 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner36.3
Rank #31/60 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
22.1
Rank #48/60 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner31.8
Rank #34/58 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
15.9
Rank #45/58 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner78.2
Rank #18/51 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
51.3
Rank #38/51 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner90.3
Rank #6/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
74.2
Rank #34/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner85.9
Rank #23/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
76.6
Rank #40/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner25.1
Rank #24/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
7.0
Rank #44/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner29.3
Rank #27/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
26.8
Rank #31/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner66.3
Rank #28/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
56.0
Rank #39/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner42.1
Rank #31/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
26.3
Rank #48/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner1272.0
Rank #16/46 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
1096.0
Rank #39/46 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
72.9
Rank #28/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
winner83.5
Rank #19/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner67.9
Rank #27/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
41.5
Rank #42/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner95.9
Rank #6/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
61.1
Rank #40/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner55.0
Rank #25/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
24.3
Rank #47/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner34.1
Rank #32/51 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
1.2
Rank #51/51 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner1183.0
Rank #32/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
525.0
Rank #51/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
GLM-4.7
winner53.5
Rank #35/68 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Kimi K2
30.2
Rank #57/68 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
34 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 39 tok/s / 28124ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and Kimi K2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Kimi K2 Kimi K2 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers. |
TL;DR: GLM-4.7 leads across 130 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| First-token latency, Free providers |
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | Kimi K2 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | Moonshot AI |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-12-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | moonshotai/kimi-k2-0905 |
| References | No data | No data |
Kimi K2
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
AIHubMix5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 41223ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
N1N5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 7681ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
QYES AI5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Kimi K2 speed / latency 40 tok/s / 2614ms input / output No data |
|---|
素墨API5 tests | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7-free speed / latency 309 tok/s / 3722ms input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Kimi K2 moonshotai/kimi-k2:free speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
|---|
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Kimi K2 kimi-k2-0905 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.022/M / $0.088/M | Kimi K2 kimi-k2-0905 speed / latency No data input / output $1.03/M / $1.03/M |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M | Kimi K2 kimi-k2-0905 speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
