LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 2.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GLM-4.7

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5

glm-4-7-vs-gpt-5

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins3 wins2 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Average speed, Recent testsFirst-token latency, Provider coverage

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-4.7
OpenAIGPT-5
LiveCodeBench
89.4%#3

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.7
OpenAIGPT-5
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.7
OpenAIGPT-5
20 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-4.7
OpenAIGPT-5
When to choose each model

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Recent tests.

GPT-5

GPT-5 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: GLM-4.7 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

Model metadataGLM-4.7 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.GPT-5 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperNo dataOpenAI
Context window202.8K tokens128K tokens
Max output131.1K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerOtherGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo data2024-09-30
OpenRouter IDz-ai/glm-4.7openai/gpt-5-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data
84.6%
#11
MMLU-Pro
85.6%#16
87.1%#7
SciCode
45.1%#22
42.9%#31
Input price
$0.600/M#23
$1.25/M#30
HLE
25.1%#30
26.5%#24
Output price
$2.20/M#25
$10.00/M#41
GPQA
85.9%#27
85.4%#31
Time to first token
0.86 s#28
62.85 s#104

speed / latency

95 tok/s / 1234ms

input / output

No data

Mars HK15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

speed / latency

134 tok/s / 1161ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 7681ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5

speed / latency

102 tok/s / 948ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

speed / latency

39 tok/s / 32323ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 15844ms

input / output

No data

AIHubMix5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 41223ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

紫脑喵
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

glm-4.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5

gpt-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.35/M / $10.80/M

涵冰API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

glm-4.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.020/M / $0.040/M

OpenAI

GPT-5

gpt-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.020/M / $0.160/M

CHB API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

glm-4.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.022/M / $0.088/M

OpenAI

GPT-5

gpt-5-2025-08-07

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.034/M / $0.274/M

钠 API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

glm-4.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.137/M / $0.137/M

OpenAI

GPT-5

gpt-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.036/M / $0.285/M

Claw API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.7

glm-4.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.151/M

OpenAI

GPT-5

gpt-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.147/M / $1.17/M

V-API
ChatGLMGLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.46 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.76 verified data points
ChatGLMGLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.76 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:42 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.