Data points: 80
The readout for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 2.
Evidence depth
80 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7
The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.2glm-4-7-vs-gpt-5-2 | Model A GLM-4.7 | Model B GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 3 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Recent tests | First-token latency, Provider coverage |
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | No data | OpenAI |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Dec 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input FileImageText Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | openai/gpt-5.2-chat |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench | 89.4%#3 | 88.9%#4 |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.6%#16 | 87.4%#6 |
| GPQA | 85.9%#27 | 90.3%#9 |
| HLE | 25.1%#30 | 35.4%#9 |
| SciCode | 45.1%#22 | 52.1%#9 |
| Input price | $0.600/M#23 | $1.75/M#35 |
| Output price | $2.20/M#25 | $14.00/M#43 |
| Time to first token | 0.86 s#28 | 115.69 s#108 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
N1N20 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 7681ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data |
星见雅 API20 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 39 tok/s / 32323ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 2671ms input / output No data |
Mars HK15 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 134 tok/s / 1161ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Medu Chat10 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 420 tok/s / 2872ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
PackyAPI10 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 94 tok/s / 11492ms input / output No data |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M / $600.00/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.020/M / $0.040/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.020/M / $0.160/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.022/M / $0.088/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-medium speed / latency No data input / output $0.024/M / $0.192/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.151/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.034/M / $0.274/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M / $10.27/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.034/M / $0.274/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Recent tests. | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage. |
TL;DR: GLM-4.7 leads across 80 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
