Data points: 119
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5.1, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 26.7 to 73.3.
Evidence depth
119 data points
Includes 27 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.1
The charts below split 36 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 26.7 pts | 73.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 4 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Image |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Nov 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | openai/gpt-5.1 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GPT-5.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 leads these benchmark categories: Coding, Reasoning.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Knowledge, Math, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.7
48.8
Avg. score
GPT-5.1
52
GPT-5.1 leads by 0.5
GLM-4.7 leads by 4.3
GLM-4.7 leads by 2.2
GPT-5.1 leads by 17.9
GPT-5.1 leads by 5.2
No data
No data
GPT-5.1 leads by 1.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.7
39.0
Rank #82/84 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner56.0
Rank #41/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner$2.20/M
Rank #68/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$1.00/M
Rank #75/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
$3.44/M
Rank #117/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$0.600/M
Rank #80/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
$1.25/M
Rank #107/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
64.0
Rank #49/89 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner75.0
Rank #3/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
79.4%
Rank #66/125 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner87.0%
Rank #12/125 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
66.4%
Rank #127/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner87.3%
Rank #33/188 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
1.7
Rank #48/73 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner4.9
Rank #34/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
6.1%
Rank #127/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner26.5%
Rank #40/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
56.2%
Rank #48/115 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner86.8%
Rank #4/115 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
45.3
Rank #37/59 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner49.4
Rank #32/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner45.1
Rank #40/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
43.3
Rank #45/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
35.4%
Rank #110/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner43.3%
Rank #42/185 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
2.4
Rank #42/47 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner31.0
Rank #19/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
26.1
Rank #51/56 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner49.9
Rank #30/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner90.3
Rank #10/90 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
51.3
Rank #65/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
29.3
Rank #44/90 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner37.6
Rank #31/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
85.9
Rank #42/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner87.3
Rank #36/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
25.1
Rank #44/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner26.5
Rank #39/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
33.7
Rank #52/99 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner36.9
Rank #42/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner1251.0
Rank #31/66 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
1212.0
Rank #38/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
67.9
Rank #44/86 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner72.9
Rank #30/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner95.9
Rank #11/84 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
81.9
Rank #52/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner33.3
Rank #25/50 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
24.4
Rank #35/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner1166.0
Rank #25/55 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
988.0
Rank #35/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
winner25.4
Rank #30/55 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
21.0
Rank #36/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
GLM-4.7
40.0
Rank #37/50 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GPT-5.1
winner41.2
Rank #35/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 134 tok/s / 1161ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 7681ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency 96 tok/s / 1862ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 41223ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 4675ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 24 tok/s / 23070ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.041/M/$0.151/M | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.086/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.035/M/$0.139/M | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.277/M | |
GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.040/request | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1-2025-11-13 speed / latency No data input / output $2.50/M | |
GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.040/request | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1-2025-11-13 speed / latency No data input / output $2.50/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
