Data points: 56
Model compare
The readout for GLM-5 and Qwen3 Omni Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Tie. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Tie
Tie has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 50 to 50.
Evidence depth
56 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Tie
The charts below split 7 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5 and Qwen3 Omni Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Tie | Tie |
| Weighted overall score | 50.0 pts | 50.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 202.8K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | No data |
| Released | Feb 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-5 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5 and Qwen3 Omni Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-5
GLM-5 has these operational advantages: Free providers, Provider coverage.
Qwen3 Omni Flash
Qwen3 Omni Flash has these operational advantages: Average speed, First-token latency.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-5
47.9
Avg. score
Qwen3 Omni Flash
-
GLM-5
GLM-5
GLM-5
GLM-5
GLM-5
GLM-5
No data
GLM-5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Omni Flash |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | GLM-5 speed / latency 41 tok/s / 18111ms input / output No data | Qwen3 Omni Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-5 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 23132ms input / output No data | Qwen3 Omni Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.010/request | Qwen3 Omni Flash qwen3-omni-flash-nx speed / latency 62 tok/s / 5127ms input / output $0.010/request |
0 tests | GLM-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Omni Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Omni Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.274/M/$1.23/M | Qwen3 Omni Flash qwen3-omni-flash speed / latency No data input / output $15.41/M | |
GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.411/M/$1.64/M | Qwen3 Omni Flash qwen3-omni-flash-2025-09-15 speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M |
Weighted outcome: Tie. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
