Data points: 85
Model compare
The readout for GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 4 to 96.
Evidence depth
85 data points
Includes 10 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 4.0 pts | 96.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 4 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 4.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-12-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-4-turbo | openai/gpt-5.2 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-4 Turbo and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo has these operational advantages: First-token latency.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-4 Turbo
46.8
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.8
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 13.0
GPT-5.2 leads by 11.1
GPT-5.2 leads by 2.4
GPT-5.2 leads by 10.1
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-4 Turbo
$10.00/M
Rank #153/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$1.75/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
$15.00/M
Rank #153/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$4.81/M
Rank #132/162 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
$30.00/M
Rank #151/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$14.00/M
Rank #133/162 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
69.4%
Rank #103/125 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner81.4%
Rank #54/125 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
3.3%
Rank #180/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
31.9
Rank #84/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2023-11-06
GPT-5.2
winner52.1
Rank #18/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
GPT-4 Turbo
29.1%
Rank #91/115 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner66.9%
Rank #36/115 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
31.9%
Rank #128/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner40.4%
Rank #64/185 · confidence 4
GPT-4 Turbo
3.3
Rank #94/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2023-11-06
GPT-5.2
winner35.4
Rank #21/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
GPT-4 Turbo
7.9
Rank #96/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2023-11-06
GPT-5.2
winner42.2
Rank #22/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | GPT-4 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data |
10 tests | GPT-4 Turbo speed / latency 73 tok/s / 1218ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 71 tok/s / 2893ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-4 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 3553ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-4 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 55 tok/s / 1434ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-4 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 54 tok/s / 1449ms input / output No data |
GPT-4 Turbo gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
