Data points: 115
Model compare
The readout for GPT-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 52 to 48.
Evidence depth
115 data points
Includes 25 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.1
The charts below split 33 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 52.0 pts | 48.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input ImageTextFile Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.1 | minimax/minimax-m2.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Knowledge) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.1
52
Avg. score
MiniMax M2.7
51
GPT-5.1 leads by 2.8
GPT-5.1 leads by 2.0
MiniMax M2.7 leads by 2.0
GPT-5.1 leads by 1.3
GPT-5.1
No data
No data
MiniMax M2.7 leads by 1.1
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.1
winner56.0
Rank #41/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
51.0
Rank #56/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
$3.44/M
Rank #117/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.525/M
Rank #41/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$1.20/M
Rank #43/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
$1.25/M
Rank #107/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner75.0
Rank #3/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
68.7
Rank #27/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
87.3%
Rank #33/188 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.4%
Rank #32/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
winner4.9
Rank #34/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
0.6
Rank #65/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
26.5%
Rank #40/187 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner28.1%
Rank #34/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
24.6
Rank #18/33 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner27.0
Rank #15/33 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
43.3%
Rank #42/185 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner47.0%
Rank #25/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.1
49.4
Rank #32/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner52.6
Rank #30/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
43.3
Rank #45/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner47.0
Rank #31/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
winner5.6
Rank #19/29 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
0.7
Rank #29/29 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
winner37.6
Rank #31/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
26.1
Rank #53/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
26.5
Rank #39/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner28.1
Rank #34/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
87.3
Rank #36/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.4
Rank #35/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
36.9
Rank #42/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner38.1
Rank #37/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
winner51.3
Rank #65/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
34.4
Rank #79/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
1212.0
Rank #38/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner1271.0
Rank #25/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
72.9
Rank #30/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner75.7
Rank #18/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
24.4
Rank #35/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner32.9
Rank #26/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
988.0
Rank #35/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner1159.0
Rank #26/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
21.0
Rank #36/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner25.6
Rank #29/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
winner41.2
Rank #35/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
40.4
Rank #36/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.1
81.9
Rank #52/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-11-13
MiniMax M2.7
winner84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
110 tests | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 430 tok/s / 2481ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 13310ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.1 speed / latency 96 tok/s / 1862ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 10977ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 44 tok/s / 8756ms input / output No data |
GPT-5.1 gpt-5-1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.100/request | |
GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0041/request | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.863/M | |
GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1-high speed / latency No data input / output $0.0068/request | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.288/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
