Sponsored byFusecodeEnterprise coding API for Claude Code, Codex, and model workflows.
LogoLMSpeed
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Leaderboard
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Models
  4. Gpt 5.2 vs O4 Mini
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Tools
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Audit
Company
  • About
Resources
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
  • Public API
  • Botab
  • VidBee
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

Model compare

GPT-5.2 vs O4 Mini

The readout for GPT-5.2 and O4 Mini, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

OpenAI

Contender
vs

Model B

OpenAI

O4 Mini

OpenAI

Leading

Key Takeaways

Weighted outcome: O4 Mini. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.

Decision read

O4 Mini

O4 Mini has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 42.7 to 57.3.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with O4 Mini

The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Change comparison

Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.

Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.

On this page

Comparison sheetWhen to choose each modelBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesFAQ

Comparison sheet

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and O4 Mini: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Model compare
OpenAIGPT-5.2
OpenAIO4 Mini
Overall leaderContenderLeading
Weighted overall score42.7 pts57.3 pts
Benchmark category leads1 categories2 categories
Operational advantagesCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverageAverage speed
Context window400K tokens200K tokens
Max output128K tokens100K tokens
Modalities

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text

Input

ImageTextFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning

The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.

Model metadata

Model compare
OpenAIGPT-5.2
OpenAIO4 Mini
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2025
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo data2024-06-30
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-5.2openai/o4-mini
ReferencesNo dataNo data

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and O4 Mini: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).

OpenAI

O4 Mini

O4 Mini is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Math) and operational dimensions (Average speed).

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Category performance

Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.

Model A coverage
7 / 8
Model B coverage
3 / 8
Shared
3 shared categories

Avg. score

GPT-5.2

52.8

Avg. score

O4 Mini

59.1

Agents

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.248.3
O4 Mini-

Coding

O4 Mini leads by 3.1

GPT-5.256.6
O4 Mini59.7

Reasoning

GPT-5.2 leads by 1.0

GPT-5.254.6
O4 Mini53.6

Knowledge

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.256.8
O4 Mini-

Math

O4 Mini leads by 8.2

GPT-5.255.9
O4 Mini64.1

Multilingual

No data

GPT-5.2-
O4 Mini-

Multimodal

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.242.8
O4 Mini-

Instruction following

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.254.9
O4 Mini-

Professional benchmark details

Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.

Pricingverified

Output price

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

$14.00/M

Rank #133/162 · confidence 4

+$9.60/M

O4 Mini

winner

$4.40/M

Rank #97/162 · confidence 4

Pricingverified

Blended price

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

$4.81/M

Rank #132/162 · confidence 4

+$2.89/M

O4 Mini

winner

$1.93/M

Rank #98/162 · confidence 4

Pricingverified

Input price

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

$1.75/M

Rank #120/162 · confidence 4

+$0.650/M

O4 Mini

winner

$1.10/M

Rank #102/162 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

MMLU-Pro

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

81.4%

Rank #54/125 · confidence 4

+1.8%

O4 Mini

winner

83.2%

Rank #40/125 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

HLE

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

7.3%

Rank #109/187 · confidence 4

+10.2%

O4 Mini

winner

17.5%

Rank #64/187 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

GPQA

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

71.2%

Rank #110/188 · confidence 4

+7.2%

O4 Mini

winner

78.4%

Rank #81/188 · confidence 4

Codingverified

LiveCodeBench

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

66.9%

Rank #36/115 · confidence 4

+19.0%

O4 Mini

winner

85.9%

Rank #6/115 · confidence 4

Codingverified

SciCode

SourceGPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GPT-5.2

40.4%

Rank #64/185 · confidence 4

+6.1%

O4 Mini

winner

46.5%

Rank #30/185 · confidence 4

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.2
OpenAIO4 Mini
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.2
OpenAIO4 Mini
智增增API30 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O4 Mini

speed / latency

93 tok/s / 7030ms

input / output

No data

N1N15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O4 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

BUZZ5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 3553ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O4 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Yun API5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

32 tok/s / 1965ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O4 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

42公益站0 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O4 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

兔子API
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/request

OpenAI

O4 Mini

o4-mini

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/request

FAQ

Weighted outcome: O4 Mini. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-5.2 vs O4 Mini into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

OpenAIGPT 5 vs GPT-5.2gpt-5-vs-gpt-5-2OpenAIGPT 5 1 vs GPT-5.2gpt-5-1-vs-gpt-5-2OpenAIGPT 4 vs GPT-5.2gpt-4-vs-gpt-5-2OpenAIGPT 4O vs GPT-5.2gpt-4o-vs-gpt-5-2

Data as of Jul 26, 2026, 08:18 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.