Data points: 53
The readout for GPT-5.2 and Qwen-72B, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
53 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GPT-5.2 vs Qwen-72Bgpt-5-2-vs-qwen-72b | Model A GPT-5.2 | Model B Qwen-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | No data |
| Model metadata | GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | OpenAI | No data |
| Context window | 128K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 16.4K tokens | No data |
| Released | Dec 2025 | No data |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2-chat | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 | Qwen-72B |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Qwen-72B |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Qwen-72B |
|---|---|---|
APDSM0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen-72B speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Chlink API0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen-72B speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
MapleLeaf API0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen-72B speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Newagiai0 tests | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-all speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0068/M / $0.0068/M | Qwen-72B qwen-72b-chat speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $10.27/M / $10.27/M |
SanShui API0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen-72B speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.0068/M / $0.0068/M | Qwen-72B qwen-72b-chat speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M / $10.27/M | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Qwen-72B qwen-72b-chat speed / latency No data input / output $15.41/M / $15.41/M | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.014/M / $0.014/M | Qwen-72B qwen-7b-chat speed / latency No data input / output $20.55/M / $20.55/M | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.050/M / $0.050/M | Qwen-72B qwen-72b-chat speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M / $75.00/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Qwen-72B: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GPT-5.2 | Qwen-72B |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Qwen-72B Qwen-72B does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 53 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GPT-5.2 vs Qwen-72B into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
