LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 53

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiniMax M2.5 Lightning, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 1.

Evidence depth

53 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

claude-opus-4-6-vs-minimax-m2-5-lightning

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins3 wins1 wins
Where it leadsFree providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
MinimaxMiniMax M2.5 Lightning
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
MinimaxMiniMax M2.5 Lightning
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
MinimaxMiniMax M2.5 Lightning
25 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2542ms

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiniMax M2.5 Lightning: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
MinimaxMiniMax M2.5 Lightning
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 53 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.5 Lightning into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

Cheapest input price
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperAnthropicNo data
Context window1M tokensNo data
Max output128K tokensNo data
ReleasedApr 2026No data
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
No data
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
None listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data
Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

MiniMax-M2.5-lightning

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.0001/M / $0.0001/M

KFCV500 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Newagiai0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

MiniMax-M2.5-lightning

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.288/M / $1.15/M

OfoxAI0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ZenMux0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

柏拉图AI
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Minimax

MiniMax M2.5 Lightning

MiniMax-M2.5-lightning

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.288/M / $1.15/M

OptAI
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 01:51 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.