Data points: 72
Model compare
The readout for DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek R1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 92 to 8.
Evidence depth
72 data points
Includes 7 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with DeepSeek R1
The charts below split 13 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 92.0 pts | 8.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 16K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | |
| Released | May 2025 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-07-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-r1 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro has these operational advantages: Average speed, First-token latency.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
DeepSeek R1
48.1
Avg. score
Gemini 2.0 Pro
48.3
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 leads by 6.0
DeepSeek R1 leads by 2.2
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 leads by 5.1
No data
No data
DeepSeek R1
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
DeepSeek R1
winner84.9%
Rank #27/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
80.5%
Rank #59/125 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner81.3%
Rank #70/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
62.2%
Rank #134/188 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner14.9%
Rank #73/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
6.8%
Rank #116/187 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner77.0%
Rank #22/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
34.7%
Rank #81/115 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner40.3%
Rank #66/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
31.3%
Rank #130/185 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner89.3%
Rank #4/68 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
36.0%
Rank #36/68 · confidence 4
DeepSeek R1
winner98.3%
Rank #6/74 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro
92.3%
Rank #29/74 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
361 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 1011ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Pro speed / latency 87 tok/s / 12318ms input / output No data |
13 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency 104 tok/s / 2242ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Pro speed / latency 49 tok/s / 1774ms input / output No data |
5 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency 6 tok/s / 4163ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
3 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Pro speed / latency 70 tok/s / 7126ms input / output No data |
DeepSeek R1 deepseek-r1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | Gemini 2.0 Pro gemini-2.0-pro-exp speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek R1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
