Data points: 83
Model compare
The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.5V, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 69.3 to 30.7.
Evidence depth
83 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with DeepSeek V3.2
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.5V: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 69.3 pts | 30.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | 65.5K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Aug 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-12-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 | z-ai/glm-4.5v |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4.5V: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is stronger in benchmark categories (Math) and operational dimensions (Average speed).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
DeepSeek V3.2
48.1
Avg. score
GLM-4.5V
47.1
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 leads by 8.8
DeepSeek V3.2 leads by 3.1
DeepSeek V3.2
GLM-4.5V leads by 1.0
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
DeepSeek V3.2
winner$0.420/M
Rank #18/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
$1.80/M
Rank #60/163 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner$0.315/M
Rank #27/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
$0.900/M
Rank #72/163 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner$0.280/M
Rank #44/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
$0.600/M
Rank #81/163 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner86.2%
Rank #15/125 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
75.1%
Rank #88/125 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner22.2%
Rank #49/186 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
3.6%
Rank #172/186 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner84.0%
Rank #52/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
57.3%
Rank #151/187 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner86.2%
Rank #5/115 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
35.2%
Rank #79/115 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2
winner38.9%
Rank #81/184 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
18.8%
Rank #174/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
136 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 26 tok/s / 11125ms input / output No data | GLM-4.5V speed / latency 73 tok/s / 6154ms input / output No data |
45 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 deepseek-v3.2 speed / latency 235 tok/s / 1787ms input / output $0.0079/M/$0.023/M | GLM-4.5V zai-org/GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.096/M |
10 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 22 tok/s / 5987ms input / output No data | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 28 tok/s / 1519ms input / output No data | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 6182ms input / output No data | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek-V3.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.025/request | GLM-4.5V glm-4.5v speed / latency No data input / output $1.00/M | |
DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek-V3.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.025/request | GLM-4.5V glm-4.5v speed / latency No data input / output $1.00/M |
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
