Data points: 75
The readout for GLM-4.7 Flash and Ling 2.6 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GLM-4.7 Flash
GLM-4.7 Flash currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
75 data points
Includes 10 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7 Flash
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare GLM-4.7 Flash vs Ling 2.6 Flashglm-4-7-flash-vs-ling-2-6-flash | Model A GLM-4.7 Flash | Model B Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.7 Flash
33.2
Avg. score
Ling 2.6 Flash
39.7
Selected category
Coding
GLM-4.7 Flash leads by 8.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.7 Flash
11.0
Rank #116/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner37.0
Rank #91/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GLM-4.7 Flash
22.58 s
Rank #98/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
92.3 tok/s
Rank #69/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner180.9 tok/s
Rank #27/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
0.92 s
Rank #47/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.070/M
Rank #5/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
$0.100/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
$0.153/M
Rank #11/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.150/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
$0.400/M
Rank #13/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #8/167 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner7.1%
Rank #110/186 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2%
Rank #125/186 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
58.1%
Rank #147/187 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner59.3%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner33.7%
Rank #118/184 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1%
Rank #150/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 Flash | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 Flash | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 Flash and Ling 2.6 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 Flash | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 Flash GLM-4.7 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: GLM-4.7 Flash leads across 75 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 Flash vs Ling 2.6 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 Flash exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | Ling 2.6 Flash exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | inclusionAI |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 16.4K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7-flash | inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
APDSM0 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Astrdark0 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
CM-API 公益站0 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Dext API0 tests | GLM-4.7 Flash z-ai/glm-4.7-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0049/M/$0.033/M | Ling 2.6 Flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0033/M/$0.0099/M |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
