Data points: 71
The readout for GLM-4.7 and Ring Flash 2.0, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
71 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GLM-4.7 vs Ring Flash 2.0glm-4-7-vs-ring-flash-2-0 | Model A GLM-4.7 | Model B Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | Average speed, First-token latency |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench | 89.4%#3 | 62.8% |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
40 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 16663ms input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and Ring Flash 2.0: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 | Ring Flash 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Ring Flash 2.0 Ring Flash 2.0 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: GLM-4.7 leads across 71 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 vs Ring Flash 2.0 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | No data |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | No data |
| Released | Dec 2025 | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
| Input price | $0.600/M#23 | $0.140/M#8 |
|---|
| Output price | $2.20/M#25 | $0.570/M#9 |
|---|
| Blended price | $1.00/M#38 | $0.247/M#14 |
|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 85.6%#16 | 79.3%#43 |
|---|
| SciCode | 45.1%#22 | 16.8%#114 |
|---|
| GPQA | 85.9%#27 | 72.5%#76 |
|---|
| HLE | 25.1%#30 | 8.9%#67 |
|---|
speed / latency
90 tok/s / 6434ms
input / output
No data
AIHubMix5 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 41223ms input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
AI API0 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
KFCV500 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
OpenRouter Fans0 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ring Flash 2.0 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.600/M / $2.20/M | Ring Flash 2.0 inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 speed / latency No data input / output $0.140/M / $0.570/M |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $1.96/M / $7.83/M | Ring Flash 2.0 inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 speed / latency No data input / output $0.490/M / $0.979/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
