Data points: 53
The readout for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 Next, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
53 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with MiniMax M2.7
The charts below split 8 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Nextminimax-m2-7-vs-qwen3-next | Model A MiniMax M2.7 | Model B Qwen3 Next |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Next |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Next |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Next |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 33 tok/s / 12037ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 Next: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Next |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Qwen3 Next Qwen3 Next does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: MiniMax M2.7 leads across 53 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Next into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | MiniMax M2.7 exposes 204.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | No data |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | No data |
| Released | Mar 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | minimax/minimax-m2.7 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Qwen3 Next
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
SWT-API5 tests | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 10977ms input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M | Qwen3 Next qwen3-next-80b-a3b speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M |
|---|
933999 API0 tests | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Next speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Elysiver API0 tests | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Next speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
ETC API0 tests | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Next speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M | Qwen3 Next qwen3-next-80b-a3b speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M |
MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $1.00/M / $1.00/M | Qwen3 Next qwen3-next speed / latency No data input / output $1.00/M / $1.00/M |
MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $6.00/M / $6.00/M | Qwen3 Next qwen3-next:80b speed / latency No data input / output $6.00/M / $6.00/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
