Data points: 56
Model compare
The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 60 to 40.
Evidence depth
56 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with DeepSeek V3.2
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 60.0 pts | 40.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Released | Dec 2025 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage.
GLM-4
GLM-4 has these operational advantages: Average speed, First-token latency.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
DeepSeek V3.2
48.1
Avg. score
GLM-4
-
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4 |
|---|---|---|
176 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 26 tok/s / 11125ms input / output No data | GLM-4 speed / latency 73 tok/s / 739ms input / output No data |
45 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 235 tok/s / 1787ms input / output No data | GLM-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 37 tok/s / 1522ms input / output No data | GLM-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 34 tok/s / 2500ms input / output No data | GLM-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 22 tok/s / 5987ms input / output No data | GLM-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
DeepSeek V3.2 deepseek-v3.2-speciale speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GLM-4 glm-4 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
