Data points: 89
Model compare
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-4o
The readout for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-4o, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Key Takeaways
Weighted outcome: Gemini 3.1 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 92 to 8.
Evidence depth
89 data points
Includes 12 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 3.1 Pro
The charts below split 22 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Change comparison
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Comparison sheet
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 92.0 pts | 8.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 6 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price, First-token latency |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Modalities | Input AudioFileImageTextvideo Output Text | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeWeb search |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
Model metadata
Model metadata
| Model compare | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Nov 2024 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Gemini | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2023-10-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | openai/gpt-4o |
| References | No data | No data |
When to choose each model
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Math) and operational dimensions (Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
GPT-4o
GPT-4o has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, First-token latency.
Benchmark score comparison
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Category performance
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
- Model A coverage
- 8 / 8
- Model B coverage
- 6 / 8
- Shared
- 6 shared categories
Avg. score
Gemini 3.1 Pro
57
Avg. score
GPT-4o
42.4
Agents
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 11.6
Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 13.8
Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 17.5
Knowledge
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 8.2
Math
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 12.4
Multilingual
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Multimodal
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Instruction following
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads by 13.6
Professional benchmark details
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Professional benchmark details
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner67.0
Rank #27/112 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
43.0
Rank #104/112 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner58.7
Rank #6/113 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
33.3
Rank #96/113 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner36.9
Rank #15/47 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
0.3
Rank #47/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner54.3
Rank #35/63 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
25.2
Rank #61/63 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner94.1
Rank #5/113 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
54.3
Rank #107/113 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner54.9
Rank #9/106 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
19.9
Rank #90/106 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner47.0
Rank #10/114 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
2.4
Rank #114/114 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner30.4
Rank #48/117 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
11.1
Rank #107/117 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner50.9
Rank #76/106 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
37.9
Rank #89/106 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner1265.0
Rank #32/78 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
842.0
Rank #77/78 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner77.1
Rank #7/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
34.3
Rank #80/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Gemini 3.1 Pro
winner95.6
Rank #17/82 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-19
GPT-4o
25.1
Rank #73/82 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
API audit comparison
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
API audit comparison
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Provider examples
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
Provider examples
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 3.1 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
速创API25 tests | Gemini 3.1 Pro speed / latency 105 tok/s / 12723ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency 88 tok/s / 1593ms input / output No data |
CatClaw API20 tests | Gemini 3.1 Pro speed / latency 121 tok/s / 11404ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency 57 tok/s / 3381ms input / output No data |
TradingBase API10 tests | Gemini 3.1 Pro speed / latency 102 tok/s / 12933ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
小水管 API10 tests | Gemini 3.1 Pro speed / latency 101 tok/s / 15025ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AIHubMix5 tests | Gemini 3.1 Pro speed / latency 70 tok/s / 25059ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Gemini 3.1 Pro gemini-3.1-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | |
Gemini 3.1 Pro gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-4o gpt-4o-all speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | |
Gemini 3.1 Pro gemini-3.1-pro-preview speed / latency No data input / output $0.0052/request | GPT-4o gpt-4o-2024-08-06 speed / latency No data input / output $0.171/M/$0.685/M | |
Gemini 3.1 Pro gemini-3.1-pro-preview-c speed / latency No data input / output $0.0055/request | GPT-4o gpt-4o-2024-08-06 speed / latency No data input / output $0.274/M/$1.10/M | |
Gemini 3.1 Pro gemini-3.1-pro-preview speed / latency No data input / output $0.274/M/$1.64/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.0066/request |
FAQ
Weighted outcome: Gemini 3.1 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
- Why is this comparison indexable?
- It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
- Are missing metrics invented?
- No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.
