Data points: 122
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.7 and GLM-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 52 to 48.
Evidence depth
122 data points
Includes 28 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7
The charts below split 37 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GLM-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 52.0 pts | 48.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 3 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, First-token latency | Provider coverage |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | Z.ai |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | z-ai/glm-5 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and GLM-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency).
GLM-5
GLM-5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Knowledge, Math, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.7
48.8
Avg. score
GLM-5
47.8
GLM-4.7 leads by 4.9
GLM-4.7 leads by 1.8
GLM-4.7 leads by 5.5
GLM-5 leads by 7.3
GLM-5 leads by 2.3
GLM-5
No data
GLM-5 leads by 0.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.7
39.0
Rank #82/84 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner63.0
Rank #25/84 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
winner$2.20/M
Rank #68/162 · confidence 4
GLM-5
$3.20/M
Rank #89/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$1.00/M
Rank #75/162 · confidence 4
GLM-5
$1.55/M
Rank #93/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner$0.600/M
Rank #80/162 · confidence 4
GLM-5
$1.00/M
Rank #98/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
79.4%
Rank #66/125 · confidence 4
GLM-5
winner85.7%
Rank #23/125 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
6.1%
Rank #127/187 · confidence 4
GLM-5
winner27.2%
Rank #38/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
1.7
Rank #48/73 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner2.0
Rank #46/73 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
winner64.0
Rank #49/89 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
63.3
Rank #52/89 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
66.4%
Rank #127/188 · confidence 4
GLM-5
winner82.0%
Rank #67/188 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
58.7
Rank #7/11 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner62.8
Rank #2/11 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
52.2
Rank #34/65 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner59.4
Rank #16/65 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
73.8
Rank #29/43 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner77.8
Rank #17/43 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
35.4%
Rank #110/185 · confidence 4
GLM-5
winner46.2%
Rank #32/185 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
45.1
Rank #40/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner46.2
Rank #36/96 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
26.1
Rank #51/56 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner57.2
Rank #25/56 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
2.4
Rank #42/47 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner16.4
Rank #31/47 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
winner90.3
Rank #10/90 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
34.0
Rank #80/90 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
33.2
Rank #54/55 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner77.9
Rank #14/55 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
33.7
Rank #52/99 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner39.5
Rank #34/99 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
25.1
Rank #44/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner27.2
Rank #37/96 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
winner85.9
Rank #42/96 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
82.0
Rank #56/96 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
winner29.3
Rank #44/90 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
26.9
Rank #48/90 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
1251.0
Rank #31/66 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner1274.0
Rank #23/66 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
67.9
Rank #44/86 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner72.3
Rank #33/86 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
95.9
Rank #11/84 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner98.2
Rank #6/84 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
40.0
Rank #37/50 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner51.0
Rank #21/50 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
41.0
Rank #44/46 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner56.2
Rank #33/46 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
GLM-4.7
11.7
Rank #53/53 · confidence 2 · eval date 2025-10-01
GLM-5
winner43.9
Rank #39/53 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-01
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
65 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 42 tok/s / 24443ms input / output No data | GLM-5 speed / latency 37 tok/s / 26385ms input / output No data |
55 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 16663ms input / output No data | GLM-5 speed / latency 44 tok/s / 27770ms input / output No data |
30 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-5 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 16879ms input / output No data |
20 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 17220ms input / output No data | GLM-5 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 23132ms input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 22 tok/s / 43529ms input / output No data | GLM-5 speed / latency 50 tok/s / 5302ms input / output No data |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.068/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.035/M/$0.139/M | GLM-5 glm-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.082/M |
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
