Data points: 81
The readout for GLM-4.7 and Kimi K2.5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.
Evidence depth
81 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2.5
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2.5glm-4-7-vs-kimi-k2-5 | Model A GLM-4.7 | Model B Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 1 wins | 5 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | GLM-4.7 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | Kimi K2.5 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling. |
| Developer | No data | Moonshot AI |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jan 2026 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input TextImage Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.7 | moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| HLE | 25.1%#30 | 29.4%#14 |
| SciCode | 45.1%#22 | 49.0%#14 |
| GPQA | 85.9%#27 | 87.9%#16 |
| Input price | $0.600/M#23 | $0.580/M#21 |
| Output price | $2.20/M#25 | $3.00/M#28 |
| Time to first token | 0.86 s#28 | 1.27 s#49 |
| Blended price | $1.00/M#38 | $1.19/M#43 |
| Output speed | 107.0 tok/s#45 | 47.1 tok/s#93 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
阿里云百炼 DashScope150 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 17220ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 2058ms input / output No data |
火山引擎 Ark64 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 39 tok/s / 28124ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 18 tok/s / 25450ms input / output No data |
Kriora45 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 113 tok/s / 8900ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 1181 tok/s / 2019ms input / output No data |
SiliconFlow45 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 16663ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 14302ms input / output No data |
星见雅 API30 tests | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 39 tok/s / 32323ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 22910ms input / output No data |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.548/M / $2.19/M | Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5-20260127 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0021/M / $0.0021/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7-free speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Kimi K2.5 moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | |
GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.7 and Kimi K2.5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.7 GLM-4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price. | Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Kimi K2.5 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2.5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
