Data points: 74
The readout for Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Qwen3
Qwen3 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 4.
Evidence depth
74 data points
Includes 13 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Qwen3
The charts below split 19 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Ling 2.6 Flash vs Qwen3ling-2-6-flash-vs-qwen3 | Model A Ling 2.6 Flash | Model B Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 4 wins |
| Where it leads | No data | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Ling 2.6 Flash
39.7
Avg. score
Qwen3
63.6
Selected category
Knowledge
Qwen3 leads by 24.4
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner37.0
Rank #91/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Qwen3
34.0
Rank #94/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
Qwen3
1.02 s
Rank #32/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner180.9 tok/s
Rank #27/139 · confidence 4
Qwen3
155.5 tok/s
Rank #36/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
Qwen3
1.02 s
Rank #50/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.150/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
Qwen3
$0.350/M
Rank #30/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.100/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
Qwen3
$0.200/M
Rank #29/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #8/167 · confidence 4
Qwen3
$0.800/M
Rank #31/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2%
Rank #125/186 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner6.8%
Rank #114/186 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner65.9%
Rank #128/187 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
28.5
Rank #85/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Qwen3
winner30.4
Rank #83/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1%
Rank #150/184 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner30.4%
Rank #136/184 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner48.9
Rank #66/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Qwen3
31.6
Rank #82/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
23.5
Rank #72/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Qwen3
winner76.3
Rank #27/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
65 tests | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | Qwen3 Qwen3 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Qwen3 leads across 74 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Ling 2.6 Flash vs Qwen3 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Model metadata | Ling 2.6 Flash exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | Qwen3 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | inclusionAI | No data |
| Context window | 262.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 32.8K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | 235B / 22B active |
| Tokenizer | Other | Qwen3 |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash | qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 |
| References | No data | No data |
speed / latency
88 tok/s / 14234ms
input / output
No data
AI API0 tests | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
APDSM0 tests | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Astrdark0 tests | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
CM-API 公益站0 tests | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Ling 2.6 Flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.0033/M/$0.0099/M | Qwen3 qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b speed / latency No data input / output $0.025/M/$0.041/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
