Data points: 94
Краткий вывод по Claude Opus 4.6 и DeepSeek V4 Pro перед подробной таблицей сравнения.
Вывод
Tie
Tie сейчас выглядит сильнее: проверенные победы распределены 3 к 3.
Глубина данных
94 точек данных
Включает 8 строк бенчмарков, 6 аудитов и 9 примеров провайдеров.
Сигнал выбора
Tie
Графики ниже разделяют 23 сильных сигналов по скорости, оценкам и состоянию аудита.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Proclaude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-v4-pro | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Tie | Tie |
| Verified metric wins | 3 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Recent tests |
| Метаданные модели | Метаданные OpenRouter для этой модели пока недоступны. | Метаданные OpenRouter для этой модели пока недоступны. |
| Разработчик | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Контекстное окно | No data | No data |
| Макс. вывод | No data | No data |
| Выпущена | No data | No data |
| Модальности | No data | No data |
| Возможности | Не указано | Не указано |
| Параметры | No data | No data |
| Токенизатор | No data | No data |
| Срез знаний | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | No data |
| Ссылки | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 35.9%#8 |
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 50.0%#12 |
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 88.8%#13 |
| Output price | $25.00/M#46 | $0.870/M#13 |
| Input price | $6.25/M#41 | $0.435/M#17 |
| Blended price | $10.94/M#67 | $0.544/M#26 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.32 s#33 | 83.22 s#106 |
| Time to first token | 1.32 s#54 | 1.06 s#40 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
VSLLMWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 94 76100100100 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro-free No audit yet |
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 89 56100100100 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro No audit yet |
Yuan APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 89 56100100100 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro No audit yet |
小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 84 728480100 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro No audit yet |
钠 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 80 668470100 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro No audit yet |
Omini ApiWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 78 70728088 | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
6i2 API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 280 tok/s / 3242ms input / output No data | DeepSeek V4 Pro speed / latency 189 tok/s / 4115ms input / output No data |
Kunkunout API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 40 tok/s / 16141ms input / output No data | DeepSeek V4 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Tokeness20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 44 tok/s / 2803ms input / output No data | DeepSeek V4 Pro speed / latency 41 tok/s / 9833ms input / output No data |
钠 API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 42 tok/s / 2282ms input / output No data | DeepSeek V4 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Rnglg2 API15 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 3926ms input / output No data | DeepSeek V4 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro speed / latency No data input / output $1.74/M / $3.48/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 c/claude-opus-4-6-thinking speed / latency No data input / output $0.0017/M / $0.0017/M | DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro speed / latency No data input / output $1.25/M / $2.50/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage. | DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Tie leads across 94 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Продолжите с Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro к близким сравнениям моделей с достаточным объёмом проверенных данных LMSpeed.
Рейтинги основаны на тестах, предоставленных сообществом, и периодических зондах работоспособности. Носит рекомендательный характер, не является официальными данными.
